Mizar TWiki discussion, pros and cons, suggestions
For general TWiki discussion, see
WikiCulture,
Wiki:WhyWikiWorks,
TWiki:Main/TWikiPresentations
Mizar specific motivation
- chronic lack of MizarDocumentation?, nobody wants to spend time on it, it gets outdated very quickly, new users get stressed and deterred; the incremental "users for users" model could make a difference
- "circular" discussions about various features, caused by the lack of documentation ("Yes we discussed this 10 years ago, then forgot about it")
- unclear feature/project? priorities, caused by low and undocumented knowledge about their interdependence
Cons
- as in any collaboration, the risk that nobody will contribute
- additionaly, the PublishOrPerish? pressure in science, forcing people to prefer their own publications (cf. the QedManifesto? Bourbaki-style utopia
)
- various MizarWebs? and MizarMailLists? exist already, their relation to Mizar Twiki is not clear (depends on authors/users)
- authorities are established, no one will want to edit AndrzejTrybulec?'s comments
Implementation
- takes most inspiration from the TWiki:Codev web, go there for additioal implementation ideas
Suggestions
Please contribute
--
JosefUrban - 05 Jul 2002
to top